User talk:LaDonnaMisteriosa

Florence Harding - Validity of First Marriage
Re your deletion of my researched input on Florence Harding, I posted this on the Talk Page:


 * I don't understand why LaDonnaMisteriosa has deleted my research into the issue of her first marriage. Historians are still divided as to whether or not there was ever a formal wedding, and both theories deserve exposure. This kind of deletion normally merits a short explanation, at least. Valetude (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Have reverted today. Valetude (talk) 11:31, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Perhaps I could anticipate some reply. That is what Talk Pages are for. Valetude (talk) 05:11, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=681706501 your edit] to Margaret Taylor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * mystery for historians" (Interview with White House curator William Allman), Kentucky New Era Hopkinsville, Ky, June 26, 1991, page 4 [[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=266&amp;dat=

Problems with upload of File:ArmandAssante-Belarus.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:ArmandAssante-Belarus.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ArmandAssante-Belarus.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ArmandAssante-Belarus.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. GRuban (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The tag above says "If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted." but that isn't quite comprehensive. You have written the file is copyrighted. Therefore we can't use it. In the Wikipedia, our content needs to be freely reusable, and editable, by everyone. Copyright is specifically the opposite of that. --GRuban (talk) 15:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Taylor
Can you try to give some reason for reverting back to the outdated format? Therequiembellishere (talk) 23:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Anything? Therequiembellishere (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Why won't you reply??? Therequiembellishere (talk) 22:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * She's mysterious. It's right in her user name. --GRuban (talk) 02:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)


 * she keeps rving me without explanation and I'm not sure what to do about it. Therequiembellishere (talk) 02:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Aha. You mean here? Well, let me speculate. The most obvious difference there that I can see is that that's not actually a picture of Margaret Taylor, right? It's a hypothetical. That's a rather important fact to put next to "her" portrait. In fact, we need a lot more information about the picture, it might be worth deleting entirely - of what value is it? The rest of the edits seem to be just reordering the same fields, unless I'm missing something. --GRuban (talk) 14:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Armand-Assante-2015.jpg
This is better, but still not sufficient. The owner of the file copyright needs to put it under a free license (usually http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Just giving "permission for it's use on Wikipedia" is not sufficient - Wikipedia content needs to be editable and reusable by anyone. You need to have the owner - would that be the webmaster? - email permissions-en@wikimedia.org explaining that and how they own the rights to the file, and release the license. Donating copyrighted materials explains in detail. Please do that, or we will have to delete this image. Sorry for the hassle, but copyright law is a tough thing. Thank you for your contribution, it is appreciated. --GRuban (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Regarding this edit, as explained, "fair use" permission is insufficient, especially when we do have a free image. We need the image to be free license, as the links above explain in detail. --GRuban (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Armand-Assante-2015.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Armand-Assante-2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

'' Before you make any further edits to the Armand Assante article, please ensure that you have read and fully understood Wikipedia's guideline on non-free content. Please leave an edit summary for every edit that you make. If you continue to revert other editors without explanation, you may be blocked from editing.''  Super Mario  Man  ( Talk ) 15:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Armand Assante, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Emotionalllama (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Armand Assante. ''You have received ample warning that your edits at Armand Assante are in violation of WP:NFC. If you make any further unjustified reverts, you will be reported to WP:AN3 and are very likely to be blocked from editing.''  Super Mario  Man  ( Talk ) 00:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Armand-Assante-2015.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Armand-Assante-2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Non free images
You have been told you cannot keep adding these into articles as it is a copyright violation. If you are the copyright holder and wish to donate the image then please see WP:donating copyright materials for what is needed to be done. noq (talk) 11:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)