User talk:LaTraviata1453

Ok then
I guess you just dont care what people are telling you (blanking your talk page when people are tiring to talk to you) ...you may have noticed that all your edits you have done have been reverted, Your last edit i will leave for someone else to delete. Your POV additions are not help full !Moxy (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Pls read Neutral point of view Neutrality requires that an article fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint, giving them "due weight". It is important to clarify that articles should not give minority views as much or as detailed a description as more widely held views; generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all. For example, the article on the Earth does not mention modern support for the Flat Earth concept, the view of a distinct minority; to do so would give "undue weight" to the Flat Earth theory. Moxy (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

NOTICE
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hello there.
I'm dropping by from the AN/I discussion linked above. It looks like you're kind of new to Wikipedia, so I thought I'd offer some advice. You're trying to add something to an article, and there's not necessarily anything wrong with that -- I'm not familiar with the source in question, but you've cited it, and I'll trust that it supports your addition. But you've found your addition reverted, and you're probably wondering why.

In the future, when something like this happens, I'd advise raising the question on the article's talk page. Ask why it was reverted. There may be no consensus for the removal, and you might find your addition reinstated. If not -- if many editors disagree with the addition -- you could also ask what could be done to make it more appropriate for inclusion. Going ahead and reinserting the material -- reverting the reversion -- without discussion isn't helpful and, in extreme circumstances, can run you up against the three-revert rule. (In fact, your reversions to Celine Dion have broken this rule. I'm not going to block you for it this time, but you should be aware of the rule in the future.)

Another thing to consider: Celine Dion is a featured article, as you can tell by the little gold star at the upper right of the article page. These articles tend to be watched pretty closely, and all attempted edits scrutinized in order to maintain their quality. An addition that might seem relatively innocuous could still be reverted if there was no discussion of the change beforehand.

Basically, please try to communicate and collaborate more. Thanks. Shimeru (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)