User talk:Laballeyllc

June 2023
Hello, I'm ARoseWolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Traditional Chinese medicine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A Rose Wolf  20:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you @ARoseWolf! I've re-added my edits with additional references from the NIH and peer-reviewed journals. Laballeyllc (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I've reverted that edit as well. The journals you cited are open-access journals with inadequate peer review. Wikipedia has very high standards for sourcing in medical articles. The sources you added were open-access journals with insufficient peer review, and therefore didn't meet those standards. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 19:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry was changed by Laballeyllc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851156 on 2023-06-18T19:12:45+00:00

Hello, Laballeyllc. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Scientific articles should prefer secondary sources to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

The editing community highly values expert contributors, so I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add request edit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 20:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
— SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 19:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 12:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.