User talk:Lacabra25

Cuckoo sandbox
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cuckoo sandbox, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://docs.cuckoosandbox.org/en/0.4.2/introduction/what/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:08, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cuckoo sandbox


The article Cuckoo sandbox has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NSOFT with no secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 11:13, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cuckoo sandbox


A tag has been placed on Cuckoo sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://cuckoo.readthedocs.org/en/latest/introduction/what/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Deor (talk) 12:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 14:17, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Cuckoo sandbox, you may be blocked from editing. ''If you want the article to stay, explain how it isn't a copyright violation (is the text public domain? Is it your own page and are you happy to release the text it under a CC licence?) rather than trying to hide the speedy deletion template and hope that nobody notices the third time. The article content is, as is stands, a problem.'' McGeddon (talk) 14:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Cuckoo sandbox. McGeddon (talk) 14:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Text is under creative commons license!


 * The text you are copypasting plainly says "© Copyright 2010-2015, Cuckoo Foundation." at the bottom. --McGeddon (talk) 14:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Cuckoo sandbox. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Deor (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)