User talk:Lachelle Wood

Nomination of Kido Blanko for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kido Blanko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kido Blanko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 20:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

What is the problem? Lachelle Wood (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

This is an artist and is found on a google search and has music all over the internet and videos. I removed the link adding him if you don’t want it there Lachelle Wood (talk) 21:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The problem is that Kido Blanko doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for stand-alone inclusion. Having an internet presence and videos "all over the internet" are not valid reasons to justify a keep.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 21:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

https://www.google.com/search?q=kido+blanko&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS768US768&oq=kido+bl&aqs=chrome.1.69i59l2j0j69i57j69i60l2.4177j0j4&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 Lachelle Wood (talk) 21:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

The link above shows artist Kido Blanko as a notable artist. Lachelle Wood (talk) 21:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

✅ Lachelle Wood (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kido Blanko. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 21:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Kido Blanko.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 21:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Kido Blanko. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 21:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Kido Blanko
You may not remove the AfD tag from the article Kido Blanko. You have been repeatedly warned about this and have persisted, so I have reported you to the administrators. Your edit summary here is a completely unnecessary personal attack and you need to stop acting like that. You are welcome to take part in the deletion discussion, but continued attempts to disrupt Wikipedia's decision process is not only ineffective, but is highly disruptive and will lead to you being blocked from editing. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 21:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kinu t/c 21:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Your edits are disruptive and some of them violate WP:NPA. Blocking you indefinitely was a justifiable option, but I hope that taking some time (i.e., the duration of your block) to review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines will lead to more constructive editing on your part in the future. -- Kinu t/c 21:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * So much for that. -- Kinu t/c</i> 17:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)