User talk:Lachso

Removal of ICAC investigation from d'Amore
I will assume that your edits were in good faith, and that you didn't check the (very solid) references for this section, or perhaps deleted in error. (I haven't checked or re-instated edits subsequent to the ICAC edit at this stage.)

If you are associated with d'Amore, please declare this.


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] As a result of the ICAC investigation, media reports have drawn attention to Angela D'Amore. In turn, this has provided readers additional information about her that may not have been widely known in the community and enhanced Wikipedia readers' knowledge. This information does not defame the Member of Parliament in any way, and is not misleading, but simply reports what is claimed in the media. If the information that is reported in the media is incorrect, then it is appropriate that the offending material be requested to be removed after matters of contention are openly discussed. Removing a large swag of information, including references, without discussion does not facilitate free and open debate. I also note that some of the material you contributed to Angela D'Amore on 13:03, 6 July 2010 appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. In relation to Tripodi, I believe that giving the relationship context is the best way to deal with this issue. I feel this has been achieved, together with independent media references. I welcome your feedback. Jherschel (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)