User talk:Ladislav Mecir

A beer for you!

 * No, problem,, you are welcome. This is a matter of convention, and it looks that the competent sources (and WP editors) started to prefer uniform lowercase as described at Bitcoin. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 20:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

General sanctions alert
TonyBallioni (talk) 21:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

logarithmic returns
Dear Ladislav, I am very glad to collaborate with someone I assume is another mathematician on the Rate of Return article. I suspect though that you have misunderstood the point about the application of return methods to logarithmic returns in cases where there are net flows. Flows should be compensated for when calculating logarithmic returns, the same as ordinary returns, and unless you use a time-weighted approach, it is easy to construct counter-examples to the usual composition laws, across time sub-periods, and between currency return and the return in instrument currency. If you are interested, we can collaborate, but please do not delete my contributions without any discussion on the Talk page first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonazo (talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

BIPS article deletion discussion
Hi Ladislav, I appreciated your comments on my AfD a lot. Would you also like to comment on Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin XT and Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin Improvement Proposal? --Ysangkok (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Bitcoin Classic
Hi, would you like to also comment on Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Classic? --Ysangkok (talk) 04:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

HocusPocus00 (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Reverting Satoshi edit
Hey mate, I'm brand new at this, was just wondering what the reason was behind reverting my edit? I'm trying to learn what best practice is. Thanks! DorkyP (talk) 23:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, . Perhaps it has been harsh from me, but it looked that your edit destroyed at least one existing citation, not giving any other to confirm the changes. It is possible that it could have been repaired. When editing, you should make sure that the citations work. I am not against updates, if you actualize both the information and the citation so that it actually works. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 23:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for replying so quickly! I just updated the citations, and thought I double-checked to make sure they worked. Sorry if I broke them! I just noticed they were three years out of date, and thought I could assist. Please let me know if I could do anything differently to get these updated values up and running. DorkyP (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You can do it, but make sure the citations work. They really did not when I reverted your edits. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 00:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks mate, you were right, one of the links was poorly formatted. Thanks heaps for your help on this! DorkyP (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

ANI Bitcoin Cash
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

bitFlyer page draft review
I was wondering if you would be willing to weigh in on whether this draft is better than the current BitFlyer page. A couple editors seemed to think the draft was better and one used the draft to replace the prior page. Then a third editor came by and deleted most of the page. As a result, I am unclear what consensus is or what I should be doing to improve it. Thank you. Sebastien0693 (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Financial markets content project
Hello,

My name is Tijana and I am a team leader of Wikinvesting.com project. Along with five of my colleagues and friends who are investment and trading enthusiasts, I have started the Wikinvesting which is based on MediaWiki platform.

Wikinvesting is a non-profit, game-changing movement which aims to round up all those individuals who believe that unbiased financial market information and knowledge should be extensively available to everyone. And this is also how I got to you :) Namely, I was searching for information I needed on financial markets and I have noticed that there isn’t a lot of "useful" information available on Wikipedia (to my surprise). In addition to that, the information available through sites such as Investopedia or Investing is tightly controlled by the business owners and hence easily manipulated. Simply, traders like me could not trust such sources in planning the investment and trading strategy...

So, what we want to create is a base where active or aspiring traders, content writers, investors, and generally financial enthusiasts will share their knowledge and experience, discuss investment opportunities, analyze news etc., all for the purpose of wikinvesting becoming the biggest financial knowledge “open source” base. I am not sure if you are familiar with the recent case of GameStop where gaming enthusiasts gather around the GameStop via reddit forum and prevented the hedge funds from sinking it down. They were basically our inspiration to starting this project.

I would love to share more information about this project with you and also discuss future potential opportunities, hence if you are interested, please let me know so we can continue this on our slack channel.

Cheers,

TijanaRistic (talk) 13:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Jtbobwaysf (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Notice left as a result of error. You can blank this if you like, but I didn't want to revert your talk page. Apologies Jtbobwaysf (talk) 16:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Body shape&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

comments
Hope you come back and start editing bitcoin articles again, I would hope that your ban at Bitcoin Cash would not extend to Bitcoin. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Archimedes&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 13:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Bitcoin Cash - Bitcoin SV splitting proposal
I have seen that you are an active contributor to the Bitcoin Cash article. I would like to inform you that there is currently a discussion on the Talk page about splitting Bitcoin SV out from the Bitcoin Cash article. It would be great to get your feedback on the split proposal. torusJKL (talk) 19:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi Ladislav Mecir! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:


 * 1) Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
 * 2) Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
 * 3) Paste  underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
 * 4) Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)