User talk:LadyBug0731

Welcome!
Hello, Sn bolduc, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hello, I'm peer reviewing your article for Marquise Lepage!

The writing style of this article is very good. Its clear and concise and gets the point across. It also seems to be very well researched, especially for the filmography section of the article. Your information comes from a variety of sources, which is great!

While the article is detailed, there is one point that seems unnecessary to mention. For instance, in the Early life and education section of the article, its mentioned that none of her family worked in film. It is not obvious, however, how this fact factors into her life or her work is not made obvious. It might be better to leave it her only having basic knowledge of cinema before deciding to create a career out of it, but this is more of a subjective criticism. The article is so solid, its a little hard to find points of criticism that haven't already been brought up!

My only other small, nit-picky suggestion would be that writing "(NFB)" after having mentioned the National Film Board disrupts the flow of that sentence slight. As NFB is not used following that sentence, you could probably get away with not including the bracketed abbreviation.

Her filmography is really well researched and informed, and formatted in a very clear way to read. Its inspired me to work out a way to make my own article's filmography section more interesting and easy to read.

Good work! Roothster2 (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for your review! I appreciate all your comments and I'll make sure to take them into consideration when I'll fix those little details for the 'final' article (which will be longer than it is now, since I still have many sources I didn't use yet). LadyBug0731 (talk) 01:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)