User talk:Ladycascadia

Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your good work so far, especially on secretary and receptionist. It's a shame there wasn't already more about administrative people; nothing would ever get done without you!

I hope you like it here and stick around to write more. If you want, you can drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself.

Before you start doing a lot of editing, you might want to look at the Tutorial. It gives a lot of the basic info you'll want to get you oriented here on Wikipedia.

You can sign your name on talk pages by using " " for your username and " ~ " for your username and a timestamp.

If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Help desk. You can also drop me a question on my talk page.

Happy editing, Isomorphic 22:12, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. I notice from you user page that you've also worked in the fashion design industry.  If you picked up any interest in that subject, you might want to take a look at our fashion-related articles.  I remember noticing a week or two ago that that area of Wikipedia is underdeveloped. Isomorphic 23:00, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

I think I may just have to check that out :) Ladycascadia 23:03, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pit lizard
Pit lizard, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Pit lizard satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Pit lizard and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Pit lizard during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SamBC(talk) 00:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Requesting protection
To request semi-protection of a page, please visit WP:RFPP. DrKiernan 06:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Rick_springfield_tacoma.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Rick_springfield_tacoma.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 02:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Not that it matters at this late time, but that picture is NOT from anyone's website! It is from my personal collection from the time in 2006 I went to a meet and greet for this celebrity in Tacoma, WA. I merely edited it so that I don't show up in the picture. It's MY photo so therefore it's my copyright. So why you are saying the copyright is "unclear" I truly don't understand! but then this is not the first time Wikipedia has tried to thwart any of my efforts to contribute, and quite frankly I'm sick of it. Ladycascadia (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 16 Magazine
I have nominated 16 Magazine, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/16 Magazine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 09:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Well guy, it seems the article was voted a "keep" thank goodness. I'm just sorry you seem to think it's acceptable to impose your personal prejudices here and attempt to destroy the hard work of others. Ladycascadia (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

An invitation for comment on Articles for deletion/Wedlease
Hello, after a recently failed attempt at a WP:PROD for the article Wedlease, I've made the decision to continue to advocate for the deletion of this article. I saw you had previously taken part in a discussion on the deletion of the article in 2013, and I wanted to invite you to comment (or vote) on the deletion. Thank you so much. --Cawhee (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of International Cruise Victims Organization


The article International Cruise Victims Organization has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NORG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 15:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)