User talk:LadyiTy

LadyiTy, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Note the restoring of sock edits to Tulisa:   and genre warring on other pages as well. Obvious MariaJaydHicky sock. Sro23 (talk) 18:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I've been looking into her edits, she's a vandalism only account, whereas I added sources and looking through the Tulisa article the other accounts you've blocked were adding correct sourced and reliable information. LadyiTy (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I rest my case. Obvious sockpuppet. Sro23 (talk) 19:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * No, I stated my version of events which you asked for. LadyiTy (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.