User talk:Ladykayyy1/sandbox

Ali's peer review
This article is super informative and really holds up to the Wikipedia standards of solid facts as opposed to taking a side and expressing opinions. I think the details that you present are very detailed and will be of great help to readers. One last thing that could make your article even better is to just add some links to other Wikipedia articles in your opening paragraphs. When you mention the first list of groups that attended the music festival, it would be good to link those artists to their Wikipedia pages (if they have one). This will just help readers find out more information if they want it! Your sources also look good, and it's awesome that you have a good variety of sources so that readers know you considered multiple view points. Awesome job! Agarbacz (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Hkim856 (talk) 18:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC) I am piggybacking Ali here. This is indeed informative and well-sourced, but your readers will more appreciate if you can add some links to other existing articles (i.e. musicians, the academy, etc.) Well done! - HK.

Ashlee's peer review
Again adding on to what Ali and Professor Kim have already stated links would be great. It would also be a nice touch if you could add more scholarly sources into your topic. Also, if you could add headings that will help to tailor your post more and make it easier for others to navigate. For myself, I had to read through things in order to figure out what your main topic and sub-topics you were focusing on. Other than that, I think you are doing pretty great. Can't wait to read more on it when it is all completed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axiong36 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Sy's Peer review
The article is written with responsible facts and maintains a neutral stance so that it prevents from confusing readers and also avoids violation of the Wikipedia's rule. I love the details and introduction of reliable sources to readers. For what it is worth, I personally think the article is well-written and thoughtful. It could be improved if you introduce any other pre-existing Wiki article, which could support your ideas and enrich the information. Great job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chosok0333 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 21 October 2018 (UTC)