User talk:Ladynath3

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingsmen Agency (December 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingsmen Agency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kingsmen Agency, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kingsmen_Agency Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hatchens&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kingsmen_Agency reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 15:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Kingsmen Agency


The page Draft:Kingsmen Agency has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Kamel Ghribi draftified
Hello. You recently moved Kamel Ghribi to mainspace. However, the article is not ready for that; it contains promotional content and since you have a disclosed conflict of interest, the article should be submitted through our articles for creation process. I have undone the move and the article is in draftspace again. Please submit it through AfC once its ready. Thank you. Blablubbs | talk 21:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Also given your status as a paid editor (of which was discussed extensively in the help chat) you may not move the draft yourself. CUPIDICAE💕  13:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamel Ghribi (March 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamel Ghribi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kamel Ghribi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kamel_Ghribi Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hatchens&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kamel_Ghribi reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 04:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamel Ghribi (March 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamel Ghribi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kamel Ghribi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kamel_Ghribi Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kamel_Ghribi reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 13:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I am also writing this out here in case you don't see my comment. Stop re-submitting this repeatedly without meaningful change and stop removing the comments and decline notices. This is not acceptable behavior and your disclosure does not mean you are free to do as you please, it means that you won't be blocked immediately for a WP:TOU violation. With that being said, I strongly advise you read relevant policies and guidelines related to editing before you find yourself blocked for disruption and promotional editing. Consider this a final warning. CUPIDICAE💕  13:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kamel Ghribi has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kamel Ghribi. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamel Ghribi (July 12)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kamel_Ghribi Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Maybe going out on a limb here, but I have not been able to establish notability, or largely even verify the contents, based on the sources cited. There is also a substantial copyvio in the first section. For these reasons, as well as the repeated number of prior declines and draftifications, I'm rejecting this and moving for speedy. Reviewing admin(s) should feel free to slap me if I'm overstepping the mark.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)