User talk:Ladysofa/sandbox

Evaluating an Article
Lots of good options. I think writing on RNS would be challenging, plus it may qualify as a medical topic, so there are extra safeguards for quality. The Tibet article is controversial, which makes it challenging in a different way. The quickest way to make a meaningful contribution would be to develop one of the hospital articles. Just keep in mind that you'd need to use third-party sources (not info from the hospitals themselves), and it shouldn't read like an ad. News articles may be good. You could start a section on the Children's Hospital on OLOL's main article page. Once it gets developed, you can suggest in the talk page to make a separate article. Josef Horáček (talk) 20:30, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Final Assessment
Good contribution overall, adding a lot of useful details to that section of the article. The writing is clear, but more could be done to maintain a neutral point of view (for example, delete "only" from "only the second free-standing children's hospital in Louisiana"). Also, the citation to the source could be better formatted - revise the author's name, add the date of publication. Josef Horáček (talk) 19:02, 26 April 2019 (UTC)