User talk:Lafroyg

San Francisco fog
Hi. You keep erasing sourced stuff without justification. Please discuss on the article's talk page before acting again. Thanks! Thmazing (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to San Francisco fog, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 08:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Seconding this and also responding to your misleading edit summary in re-removing the section. I don't know what you have against a bit of harmless fun, namely "Karl the Fog", but it's well referenced enough for inclusion; the alternative is a standalone article, which I'm sure you would agree is undesirable fluff. Yngvadottir (talk) 22:23, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

The Fog Has No Name
I have a problem with stupidity perpetrated by an anonymous person that brings ridicule on a great city. Lafroyg (talk) 22:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * How am I any more anonymous than you? And where does it bring ridicule? I will revert you and start a talk page section. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Stupidity on Wikipedia
This also brings rudicule to Wikipedia by calling into doubt the veracity of its content. Lafroyg (talk) 00:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to San Francisco fog— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to San Francisco fog, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Reasons
You haven’t liked my reasons.

That content is offensive. Lafroyg (talk) 01:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mission Dolores Park without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HaeB (talk) 04:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)