User talk:Lagalog

February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Indian Removal Act has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Indian Removal Act was changed by Lagalog (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893359 on 2014-02-28T21:37:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Indian Removal Act because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Tentinator    19:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Extraterrestrial life with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Sea photo Talk 19:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Spock with [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spock&diff=598002333&oldid=596395505 this edit], you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)