User talk:Lakefall~enwiki

Rapture Ready
I just saw your comments on the Rapture Ready talk page. It's easy to be baffled by these people. I'm a Christian myself and I have the same core beliefs about the Bible as they do, but their "end times" beliefs are questionable and most are flat out unbiblical. They see most of what is taking place in the world right now as signs that we are very close to a "pre-tribulation rapture," where Jesus will return and take all the Christians to Heaven with Him and 7 years of tribulation will come upon the Earth. After that 7 years, Jesus comes again for a third time to rule for 1,000 years (where the term "premillennialism" comes from). After that 1,000 years, they believe that Satan will come against Jesus, will be eternally defeated, and a new Heaven and Earth will be created.

However, most of what they discuss and interpret as signs of the end are the following:


 * 1) The European Union (a smaller group believe the United Nations) is prophecied in the Bible to become the New World Order that the "antichrist" will rise out of after the rapture has taken place and the world has descended into chaos.  This antichrist will make a peace treaty with Israel and its Arab neighbors, he will explain how billions of people have disappared, and the entire world will embrace him.  They see the EU and UN becoming so involved in Mideast peace as a sign that we are getting close to this peace treaty they think will take place.
 * 2) Another key belief of theirs is that Russia will eventually form an alliance with Mideast nations (namely Iran and possibly Turkey) and will invade Israel either before the rapture or during the tribulation.  Some see the EU becoming involved in this invasion of Israel.  This theory comes from their interpretation of Ezekiel 38-39.  They see Russia's helping of Iran in building their nuclear program as the Russian-Arab alliance taking shape.  They believe it's just a matter of time before this happens.  They also fully expect Iran to use nuclear weapons on Israel, which may spark this battle.  In fact, most believe that Iran already has nuclear weapons, a statement that is in total error of the facts.
 * 3) Another belief is that Damascus will be completely destroyed and will never again exist as a city.  This comes from their interpretation of Isaiah 17.

On their message board, there is endless speculation on and interpretation of every single news headline. For example, Bill Clinton said yesterday that he expects a new plan for Mideast peace to come up in the next couple of months. Most people on the board see this as possibly the peace treaty that the antichrist will make with Israel. This is just one of hundreds of headlines they have attempted to interpret. I've been lurking on the site for a few months now. I can safely say that not one of their speculations have come true.

There are problems with these beliefs, and I can tell you what they are if you wish. Clinevol98 18:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I posted my comments on the talk page of the article Rapture Index, which no longer exists. I was being tongue-in-cheek and trying to point out how the "Rapture Index" makes no sense whatsoever. Even if the core assumptions, which the "index" is based on were true, the "index" would tell us nothing useful. They even admit it themselves! Basically the "index" is nothing but a fraudulent attempt to frighten people. I was too lazy to figure out a good way to add this information to the article, so I simply made a bunch of sarcastic questions kind of hoping somebody might maybe hopefully add some explanations, which themselves would point out the problems, to the article. It doesn't matter that much anymore, as the article doesn't exist, but I guess somebody still should add a mention of the "Rapture Index" being nothing but a bad fraud, which can only fool deeply religious rapture believers and extremely dim-witted people to the Rapture Ready article. I wonder if everyone would agree my way is the NPOV way of saying it... --Lakefall 14:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You're exactly right. As I said before, I am a Christian and would agree with these people about the core beliefs about Christianity, but their end times theology is extremely off base.  The "Rapture Index" is a fraud.  As you said, they even admit that it doesn't tell us how soon Jesus will be returning but "how fast" we are moving to his return.  They say it's a "Dow Jones Industrial Average" of end time activity.  But the Dow doesn't tell us "how fast" we are moving to anything.  That tells the performance of 30 large cap US stocks.  It doesn't take a stock market junkie like me to figure that out.


 * The scale they set is totally arbitrary. All those categories (some of which shouldn't even be considered end time events) are rated on a scale 1-5.  But who says that the scale can't be 1-10 or even 1 to 100?  Maybe the "rapture index" has to be at 500 before Jesus returns :)  If you think the "rapture index" is absurd, I suggest you go to the message board at rr-bb.com and tell me what you think...currently they are convinced that Barack Obama could be the antichrist.  No, I'm not kidding.  00:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * One thing is that "how fast" is meaningless when calculating travel time, if we don't know how long the trip is. The analogy is simply worthless. They are just playing with words, trying to sound good while lacking meaning. Anyhow, I rather go to fstdt.com. They collect the best (or worst) bits. BTW, if Obama is the antichrist, does that mean EU is no longer the new Roman Empire? There is no way I'm going to let the Italians to control the EU. ;-> --Lakefall 19:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

The order of interlanguage links

 * from the pump

I would like to have a policy on how to sort interlanguage links. It's obviously a good idea to sort them alphabetically, but on some pages they are sorted by the language code and on some by the language name. This is very notable in the case of Finnish language ("suomi"), which is placed somewhere before French language ("français") by the code but right before Swedish language ("svenska") by the name. I think sorting by the language name is more logical to the reader as the language name is the only thing shown, but there is no written policy. -- Lakefall 18:51, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)


 * There is no fixed policy yet - but a poll is running for some time already at Language order poll. Currently the sorting by local language name is leading the poll. andy 19:14, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Bucha effect
You posted at Talk:Derren Brown about the Bucha effect. You may like to ask at the science reference desk; where you will get a better response --h2g2bob (talk) 22:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Lakefall. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Lakefall~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)