User talk:Lakinekaki

if you really have to, you can leave me a message here. otherwise, try to find me on some other website.

before you write here
From an interview with 2channel founder:


 * Q:  Why did you decide to use perfect anonymity, not even requiring a user name? 
 * A: ... Moreover, people can only truly discuss something when they don't know each other. If there is a user ID attached to a user, a discussion tends to become a criticizing game. On the other hand, under the anonymous system, even though your opinion/information is criticized, you don't know with whom to be upset. Also with a user ID, those who participate in the site for a long time tend to have authority, and it becomes difficult for a user to disagree with them. Under a perfectly anonymous system, you can say, "it's boring," if it is actually boring. All information is treated equally; only an accurate argument will work.

I think that Wikipedia would be a much better place if it was 100% anonymous. People would waste much less energy on arguing, and more on contributing.

I would really appreciate people not leaving me messages here, as I don't want to login again, but want to edit anonymously. Thank you. Lakinekaki (talk) 00:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of NOMORE
NOMORE, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:NOMORE and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of NOMORE during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. NJGW (talk) 08:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)