User talk:Lakjnqueen

Speedy deletion nomination of Shirley Tregre
Hello Lakjnqueen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shirley Tregre for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JamesG5 (talk) 06:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Your recent edit to Ascension Catholic High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Stop adding alumni with no articles or references. Meters (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 07:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Stop adding the alumnus with no refs or wikiarticle. There is no evidence that the person is notable or attended the school. I've left the entry for you, but if your article is speedied (as seems likely) your entry will disappear too. If you keep inserting the material you will be reported for edit warring and will likely be blocked. Meters (talk) 07:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC)