User talk:LalahGrace

Welcome!
Hello, LalahGrace, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! AIR corn (talk) 09:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Genetically modified organism
Hi Lalah. I am added back in the description saying that the most marked differences are between the USA and Europe. I found a cite to support this and think it is an interesting observation. I am also wondering if there might be a better source for the numbers than the centerforfoodsafey's map. Regards AIR corn (talk) 10:11, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

sustainability and science
Hi, welcome to wikipedia! i too have a strong interest in science; i think sustainability is an important idea that we are working on realizing in many parts of our economy. i have worked a lot on GM-related articles over the past few months, so was interested to see a new editor's name appear. this led me to your page where i had a look at your edit history. you do seem science-oriented on the optics/physics side of things (an area where i do a lot of work) and you have made edits on "non-GMO project" site and now on the GMO article itself. So here is where my question comes. When i first started reading about GMOs a few months ago, i was very surprised by many of the statements i read about how bad they are, and about how bad companies like monsanto are. however when i went to verify those statements, i found out that most of them were not true, or were distortions of what is true, or exaggerated the risks that scientists had identified. in other words, i found a surprisingly un-scientific approach to the issues. so i am curious, do you find this too? how do you put all this together? just asking... if you do not want to have this conversation that's fine. i will look for a reply here - no need to go to my page.Jytdog (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Non-GMO Project Verification Mark.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Non-GMO Project Verification Mark.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! &#124;&#124; Tako (bother me) &#124;&#124; 21:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Photonics Initiative concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Photonics Initiative, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Photonics Initiative


Hello LalahGrace. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "National Photonics Initiative".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)