User talk:Lalate

A tag has been placed on Lalate, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Lalate. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mytildebang 03:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.   Mytildebang 04:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Lalate

 * Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Danny Lilithborne 09:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

We have responded on our talk page. lalate's page is in conformance with Wikipedia policy regarding corporate pages. In the event that you believe that there is something not in conformance within the context of its page, kindly indicate it to us in talk and we will we be happy to alter it. Thank you for your help See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lalate Sorry for any deletion to the tags done in error. Lalate 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC) lalate

Lalate 09:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) lalate

You have recently re-created the article Lalate, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. A ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 16:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The article was NOT re-created but a newer, shorter, toneless article was posted. The article bared NO warning from Wikipedia of being in non conformance once posted. I have posted a request for deletion review on your talk page. Lalate 17:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC) lalate

lalate
I would like to you please undelete the lalate page.

On 11/26/06, lalate revised its page to make it conformance for Wikipedia's policy for corporate postings. The result of the posting was NO warning that it was in non conformance. Yet thereafter it was deleted.

a) It is not spam. It is a corporate listing of a company. The mere listing of a corporation page is not grounds for deletion under Wikipedia's policy since in the context of the page is not used for advertising purposes.

b) The page had no warning against it. This subsequent revision that was in conformance with Wikipedia had no warning against it for deletion but was thereafter deleted by you.

c) The page is similar to the page for CLUBPLANET, both in tone and categories. If one page is permitted another page cannot be non permitted.

Kindly undelete the lalate page or indicate what lines you felt were not in conformance.

Thank you

Lalate 17:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC) lalate

We posted Help on your user page Aecis and you DELETED our post for help on your talk page. We asking that you not touch lalate's page unless you act in conformance with Wikipedia conduct.


 * There are several reasons why I deleted your article. It was clearly advertising for a company in which you are personally involved. There was barely any assertion of notability by verifiable and reliable third party sources. The site does not even have an Alexa ranking.
 * The fact that the page carried no warning is irrelevant, because articles without warnings are not immune from deletion. And if you come across another article that you feel doesn't satisfy the notability and verifiability guidelines of wikipedia, you are free to nominate that article for deletion. However, that does not absolve this particular article of its responsibilities. If you still believe that the deletion was unjust, you are free to request a deletion review at Deletion review. A  ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 17:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * PS. I did not delete your message to me. You posted it in one of my archives, and I moved it from there to my user talk page. That's all I did. Don't worry. A  ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 17:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, LaLate. I tagged the article for speedy deletion because I didn't see any assertion that it met the notability criteria for WP:CORP or WP:WEB. How would you say it met those criteria? By the way, please visit the Deletion review page and follow the instructions there to ensure you get a review (since this discussion isn't one). Mytildebang 20:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Mytildebang

Thanks for your help. We will correct our article and repost it per your instructions. In the meantime, kindly delete the page Clubplanet since it does not conform to exactly what you have deleted lalate for - Clubplanet's page lacks any assertion of notability by verifiable, lacks any reliable third party sources, and is merely a listing of links to its website. Lalate 20:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)lalate

Thanks Mytildebang & Aecis for tagging the Clubplanet page. Lalate 20:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC) lalate


 * I kindly but strongly recommend you do not recreate the article on Lalate. Even if you can verifiably assert its notability, you will still be writing an article about a corporation in which you are personally involved. Instead, I suggest requesting a deletion review if you disagree with the deletion. You may also find the Drawing board helpful. A  ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 20:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)