User talk:Laleeibssa/Delmas Treason Trial/Davitg13 Peer Review

Overall I though your article has been greatly improved from what it originally was. There are many important new subsections and essentially the article went from only having a lead to having many crucial subheadings and sections. the organization was very well done and writing/grammar was too. I think that while the sources used are good, you could add a few more recent ones that perhaps reflect a retrospective views of the event. Maybe even backlash, or how it may have been a precedent for other cases. this could also aid in adding new section and more information to the article. The overall tone and balance was great and there was no indication of bias as you presented both sides quite well. I think you are off to a great start and I do not see any major issue with it!