User talk:Lallsons

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Lallsons
A tag has been placed on Lallsons, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. – Tivedshambo (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mankameshwar Temple
A tag has been placed on Mankameshwar Temple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Master of Puppets Care to share?  21:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

utcursch | talk 10:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Holi1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Holi1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MapVOF.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:MapVOF.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Paliwal Park Agra.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Paliwal Park Agra.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Paliwal Park Agra.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Paliwal Park Agra.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Paliwal Park Agra.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Paliwal Park Agra.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Mvjs (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mandi's of Agra
I have nominated Mandi's of Agra, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mandi's of Agra. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 13:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Lodhfalls.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lodhfalls.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Birla Precision Technologies Limited is an advertisement
The article Birla Precision Technologies Limited has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Zenith Birla Limited is an advertisement
The article Zenith Birla Limited has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Dudhwa Tiger Reserve
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://projecttiger.nic.in/dudhwa.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Hastinapur National Park, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Hastinapur National Park appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Hastinapur National Park has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Hastinapur National Park and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Hastinapur National Park with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hastinapur National Park.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 09:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Mahavir Swami Sanctuary
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mahavir Swami Sanctuary, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.travel-uttarpradesh.com/mahavir.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mahavir Swami Sanctuary, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Mahavir Swami Sanctuary appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mahavir Swami Sanctuary has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mahavir Swami Sanctuary and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mahavir Swami Sanctuary with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mahavir Swami Sanctuary.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 09:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Dudhwa Tiger Reserve
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Dudhwa Tiger Reserve appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dudhwa Tiger Reserve has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dudhwa Tiger Reserve and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dudhwa Tiger Reserve with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dudhwa Tiger Reserve.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 09:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I've delted this but noticed that conent come from a government site. If you hav e evidence that it is Public domain, let me know. Even than it would be plagiarism as the source wasn't attributed. In general, please write articles in your won words, rather than copy and paste text.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 09:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Katarniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Katarniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Katarniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Katarniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Katarniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Katarniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 09:58, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 09:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion.

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Patna Bird Sanctuary, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Patna Bird Sanctuary appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Patna Bird Sanctuary has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Patna Bird Sanctuary and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Patna Bird Sanctuary with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Patna Bird Sanctuary.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 10:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Bateshwar, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Bateshwar appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Bateshwar has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Bateshwar and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Bateshwar with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Bateshwar.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 10:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Raj Mandir, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Raj Mandir appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Raj Mandir has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Raj Mandir and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Raj Mandir with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Raj Mandir.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 10:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Guru ka Tal, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Guru ka Tal appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Guru ka Tal has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Guru ka Tal and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Guru ka Tal with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Guru ka Tal.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mehtab Bagh, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Mehtab Bagh appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mehtab Bagh has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mehtab Bagh and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mehtab Bagh with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mehtab Bagh.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 11:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Chini Ka Rauza, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Chini Ka Rauza appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Chini Ka Rauza has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Chini Ka Rauza and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Chini Ka Rauza with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Chini Ka Rauza.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 11:20, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mariams Tomb, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Mariams Tomb appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mariams Tomb has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mariams Tomb and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mariams Tomb with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mariams Tomb.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, India in Motion, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, India in Motion appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. India in Motion has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:India in Motion and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:India in Motion with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:India in Motion.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 11:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sadni Falls, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Sadni Falls appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sadni Falls has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sadni Falls and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Sadni Falls with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sadni Falls.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 11:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. . Please see See our guide to writing Wikipedia articles, and WP:Copyright. As reviewing administrator,  I have rewritten the essential parts of some of these articles, to avoid copyright violation. Please feel free to do similarly with the others, but in your own words Do not past articles from outside websites into Wikipedia -- if you continue doing it, you will be blocked from contributing. DGG (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Bateshwar, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Bateshwar appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Bateshwar has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Bateshwar and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Bateshwar with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Bateshwar.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 07:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Taj Trapezium Zone, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Taj Trapezium Zone appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Taj Trapezium Zone has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Taj Trapezium Zone and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Taj Trapezium Zone with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Taj Trapezium Zone.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 07:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ram Barat, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Ram Barat appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ram Barat has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ram Barat and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ram Barat with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ram Barat.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Places of Interest in Agra
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Places of Interest in Agra, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://asi.nic.in/asi_monu_tktd_up_mehtabbagh.asp, 2=http://bateshwar.com/culture%20&%20religion.html, 3=http://cinematreasures.org/function/29/view=expand&sort=screens&show=all, 4=http://cinematreasures.org/theater/15815/, 5=http://etah.nic.in/patna.htm, 6=http://projecttiger.nic.in/dudhwa.htm, 7=http://rajakolkata.blogspot.com/2004_10_01_archive.html, 8=http://www.agraindia.org.uk/chini-ka-rauza/glazed-tiles.html, 9=http://www.agraindia.org.uk/chini-ka-rauza/index.html, 10=http://www.agraindia.org.uk/chini-ka-rauza/square-plan.html, 11=http://www.agraindia.org.uk/monuments/guru-ka-tal.html, 12=http://www.agraindia.org.uk/tomb-of-mariam-zamani/index.html http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/rssarticleshow/msid-2841132,prtpage-1.cms, 13=http://www.american.edu/TED/taj.htm, 14=http://www.angadtoursusa.com/Family_Packages.htm, 15=http://www.asiarooms.com/travel-guide/india/agra/festivals-&-events-in-agra/ram-barat.html, 16=http://www.goldentriangletour.com/tourism-in-agra/visit-agra.html, 17=http://www.indiaenews.com/pdf/120154.pdf, 18=http://www.indiainfoweb.com/uttar-pradesh/wildlife/katarnighat-wildlife-sanctuary.html, 19=http://www.indian~holiday.com/india-wildlife-holidays/bird-sanctuaries-in-india/index, 20=http://www.india-today.com/itoday/20000807/heritage.html, 21=http://www.indiatravelroute.com/uttar-pradesh-tour/wildlife-uttarpradesh.htm, 22=http://www.mapsofindia.com/agra/bateshwar.html, 23=http://www.mapsofindia.com/agra/guru-ka-taal.html, 24=http://www.nerve.in/news:25350019341, 25=http://www.onlytravelguide.com/uttar-pradesh/adventure-wildlife/kishanpur-sanctuary.php, 26=http://www.thehindu.com/mp/2006/12/04/stories/2006120400330300.htm, 27=http://www.travel-uttarpradesh.com/mahavir.htm, 28=http://www.travel-uttarpradesh.com/mahavir.htm, 29=http://www.up-tourism.com/destination/wildlife/wildlife.htm#patna,

30=http://www.yatra.com/travel/uttarpradesh/travel-to-bateshwar.html,, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Places of Interest in Agra and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Places of Interest in Agra with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Places of Interest in Agra.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Places of Interest in Agra/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Places of Interest in Agra saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Phlegm Rooster (talk) 11:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Chini Ka Rauza
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Chini Ka Rauza, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.bharatonline.com/uttar-pradesh/travel/agra/chinika-rauza.html, http://www.abouttajmahal.com/monuments-near-taj-mahal-agra/chini-ka-rauza.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Chini Ka Rauza and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Chini Ka Rauza with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Chini Ka Rauza.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Chini Ka Rauza/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Chini Ka Rauza saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Phlegm Rooster (talk) 08:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Two week block; persistent copyright violations
You have been blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because of your persistent placement of copyrighted material on Wikipedia in spite of numerous warnings, including a warning of block in July. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text  below.

Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Further placement of copyrighted text on Wikipedia may result in your account being indefinitely blocked from editing. You must not continue to copy sentences and paragraphs from external sources and place them on Wikipedia, as this is a matter of serious legal concern to the project. If you do not understand how to revise material for use or are unclear on the fair use policies, please seek assistance. You are welcome to approach me at my talk page. You may also request help at Wikipedia's help desk, which is typically manned around the clock by volunteers. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Good work done
Hi,

I just came across your work and found that you have contributed quite a lot to Wikipedia. Over the time, my main contribution to Wikipedia have been categorization of pages, and I have created quite a lost of categories esp related to Districts of several states of India (UP, HP, Haryana, Punjab, Uttrakhand, all NE states, several in MP and Maharashtra etc) and have put pages into them. May be you would like to add you user page to category like Category:Uttar_Pradesh_Wikipedians / Category:Jhansi_Wikipedians etc. It helps in collaboration related to pages which can be mapped to some geography say pages related to City, Monuments, People etc pages. I can see you, User:Anujkhandelwal and User:Tharkee have contributed handsomely to UP and esp Agra related pages, user categories like Category:Agra_Wikipedians can bring such Wikipedians together. Vjdchauhan (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC).

Recent edits on Uttar Pradesh
Recently few Users have massively revamped Uttar Pradesh article. Although any positive edits are welcomed but large scale revisions and revamps are advised to be done after discussion and consensus especially on articles of priority. As you have been quite active on this article you are invited to participate in discussions on talk:Uttar Pradesh

--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 10:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of India in Motion


The article India in Motion has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Filmkar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filmkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Filmkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EpicPupper 01:36, 23 April 2021 (UTC)