User talk:Lalvers

http://www.gopubmed.org
I have been reviewing your recent edits and I am puzzled as to what merit these links have. The targets have very basic summaries of the diseases and conditions already adequately described in the WIkipedia articles. The website seems to be a search engine.

Be aware too that Wikipedia has an anti-spam policy which you may be in jeopardy of breaching.

Unless you can link directly to scholarly articles that are appropriate, I will delete the links that you have inserted. Regards LittleOldMe (talk) 16:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

My opinion (lalvers): The links I created show the HotTopics of GoPubMed. With the HotTopics feature we created a platform providing various statistics on biomedical literature on base of over millions of PubMed (MEDLINE) abstracts. GoPubMed HotTopics provide an alternative way to get an overview on biomedical literature. The information is free available.

With the HotTopic feature a platform is available providing various statistics on biomedical literature taking into account all PubMed (MEDLINE) abstracts. From statistics about author and journal lists over author networks and geographic information to the development of a topic over time, a variety of comprehensive information allows to gain insights fast.

Your recent link additions
Hi, Lalvers - welcome to Wiki. To answer a message here, you should leave a message on the talk page of whoever contacted you, by clicking the talk link by their name (that way they get an alert message when they sign in). Anyhow, your recent edits will undoubtedly be reverted as spam. I looked at the site and it appears to be a search engine of some sort, which is not considered valuable as an external link, since external links should be specific to the topic and add to that specific topic. Check out this page WP:EL for wiki guidelines on adding external links. In general, it is prefereable to place information in the article, in its proper place, then reference it with a link that supports that info. Bob98133 (talk) 18:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Reverted your change to Knowledge Base article
You added an external link to the Knowledge Base article which I have reverted. I documented the reasons for reverting on the talk page if you want to discuss it. RedDog (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)