User talk:Lamariedatsamarinya

January 2009
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 05:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JuJube (talk) 06:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Zack de Vries
A tag has been placed on Zack de Vries requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I placed notices on the page yesterday suggesting some improvements and questioning the truthfulness. A 19 year old who has been to every country on the planet except three? Who only recently became employed as a model? Seems like a stretch. However, instead of supplying references and substantiating the individual's notability, you merely deleted the commented tags. These leads me to increased wonder about the truthfulness of the article and I have thus nominated it for speedy deletion. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag. This is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Please resolve the issues in good faith. Regards, -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zack de Vries
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zack de Vries, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * I marked this article with tags including "noreferences" and possible "hoax" shortly after it was created. (A 19 year old who has been to every country on the planet except three? Who only recently became employed as a model for a company named "Vase Models" in South Africa, for which I can find no references? Seems like a stretch.) However, instead of supplying references and substantiating the individual's notability, the author rapidly deleted the commented tags.

These actions led me to increased wonder about the truthfulness of the article and I then nominated it for speedy deletion. The author very soon removed that tag as well. I sought input on the user's talk page, on which others have noted violations of WP policy on related topics. The author has not responded.

Given the non-responsiveness of the author, related kinds of violations, and what appears as a possible COI or spam, I think this article may need to be removed.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 09:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. ''You have been repeatedly warned to stop removing discussion templates and AfD templates which you have ignored. If you continue this behavior you will be blocked. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 08:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)'' -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 08:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)