User talk:Lambert611

March 2009
Your article addition.

The reason for the deletion mark is not that the information is WP:Verifiable, but it is WP:Promotion. You may disagree, I am just giving you some links to look through as you say it is your first edit. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

By the way "speedy deletion" does not necessarily mean it will disappear instantly; it just means it uses a mor streamlined deletion decision process.

Best wishes SimonTrew (talk) 19:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:David Whitburn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:David Whitburn.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest?
Hello - just a quick note to declare a Conflict of Interest to Sarah Whitburn & David Whitburn, pages that I have created. However can you please note that I have given accurate and well referenced information to support these pages from external sources that I do not control. I will strive to contribute more pages and edit to improve Wikipedia's content on lawyers and indeed New Zealanders in particular, as we don't seem to have got as good traction with this fantastic resource that is Wikipedia as we should in this country. Thanks for your help Stuart. Lambert611 (talk) 10:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

There is no need to delete your page as offered, a short declaration either on your user page User:Lambert611 talk page of the page in question (Talk:Sarah Whitburn) will be more than adequate. Wikipedia is short of good writing about law, lawyers, legal firms and legal cases, and you're welcome to help.

For reference, take a look at pages like Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto / Ivor Richardson / Tax protester constitutional arguments.

I understand that there are limits as to what legal practitioners can write about, just write about things that interest you that you know something about.

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Whitburn and David Whitburn

 * Hi, I'm afraid that neither Sarah Whitburn or David Whitburn are wp:n in my opinion. I have therefore put the articles forward for deletion: Articles_for_deletion/Sarah_Whitburn and Articles_for_deletion/David_Whitburn. You are welcome to comment.


 * I noticed here that you declare that you are sharing your account. Please note that this is not generally allowed, see U. Can you and your partner please set up seperate accounts?


 * Please message me on my talk page if you have any questions. Thank you Smartse (talk) 00:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Whitburn and David Whitburn concering Smartarse comments above
The account is no longer shared. Thank you for your opinions regarding deletion. On a lengthy review of these pages I created and considering the relative profiles of the two users, I would consider that the page on Sarah Whitburn be deleted for lack of external references cited (I have put my opinions on this on Articles_for_deletion/Sarah_Whitburn).

Proposed deletion of Andrew Mulligan


The article Andrew Mulligan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Searches overall found nothing to suggest solid independent notability and only finding passing mentions for the TV shows, I found nothing to even suggest a redirect to one of the listed shows. WP:TNT at best if ever notable. It's also worth noting there's some serious vandalism here (see history) that emphasizes how this is simply best deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  08:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew Mulligan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Mulligan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Andrew Mulligan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat  23:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)