User talk:Lambertman

''On 19 July 2006, I was nominated for Administratorship. Although that nomination was unsuccessful, I agree with the opinions presented regarding my lack of experience. A summary of the comments may be found here. My priorities in life have changed, and I am absolutely not seeking renomination. Thank you. :)

See also User talk:Lambertman/Archive01 and User talk:Lambertman/Archive02

Re: Colts
Any particular reasoning for that undo? Lambertman 16:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The part at the beginning of the paragraph about "until the Colts' win in Super Bowl XLI" is pompous and unneeded. As of 2006 is more accurate, as it also signifies that that station still carries games today. There really wasn't any point for a separate paragraph on the preseason games - every NFL article has a TV/Radio section, and all have the preseason games in the same paragraph as the radio. Pats1 16:43, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I believe you are reading "pompousness" where it isn't there, as the station indeed does not air games anymore, and the Super Bowl game was the last one they aired. I hope it's not just a rivalry issue that offended you so. If the Patriots switched stations after one of their SB wins, I wouldn't be offended by the wording. Also, what's wrong with the addition of the television PBP announcer's name, in your eyes? Lambertman 16:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, you didn't say anything about that or the new station. But instead of "Super Bowl XLI victory," just use "2007." It's like saying "The Colts began their 2007 offseason, the one that brought them a SB XLI victory, by..." or "They drafted Joseph Addai in 2007, the year the Colts won the Super Bowl." It's just excessive. So, what I actually would do is say, "As of 2007, the Colts radio is..." and then just leave the part about the former stations out. Pats1 16:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * First off, the New England Patriots article itself has separate paragraphs for radio and television, which makes your complaint of my doing so in the Colts article puzzling at best. Secondly, I didn't add anything about the new affiliates because they were already mentioned in the paragraph before I touched it. I'm leaving the end date as the Super Bowl because there are people out there who probably aren't large enough football fans to understand that a game played in February 2007 is considered to be part of the "2006 Season", and Wikipedia should serve to educate. However, I've left out whether the Colts won. I finally suggest that dropping a wordless undo - equating a longtime editor with a common IP vandal - can be construed as "pompous" itself. There are some rational editors who respond well to constructive comments and thoughtful editing. Lambertman 17:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

What Channel 4 should broadcast.
They should try "A Pup Named Scooby Doo" in the early morning hours, if they have the videotapes, etc. But, in fact, this cartoon is currently not aired here, I do not get "Boomerang" (whether the channel means) and it is also unavailable on Insight cable.

--4.161.5.212 06:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Um...evs! Lambertman 21:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune Daytime Version
I have reinserted the statement that you deleted - the description of the only 1976 episode of Wheel known to exist as the one with the KILL THE VAMPIRE mis-solve. Since this is what that show is most notable for, there was no real need to delete it.

--JoBrLa 01:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I would respond, but someone else agreed with me, so... Lambertman 19:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * No, the show is not most notable for something that happens in tons of episodes, it's known for being an episode from 1976, early in Woolery's tenure. FamicomJL 00:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Just like no one cares about the "Schoolhouse Riot" episode of Match Game, yet it has its own article on Wikipedia; so why can't KILL THE VAMPIRE be mentioned in Daytime Wheel? --JoBrLa 12:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but the detail of an incorrectly-solved puzzle from 31 years ago isn't encyclopedic information. That's why Lambertman and I have BOTH removed it. It's entirely enough to mention that the 1976 episode exists and has been broadcast on GSN. JTRH 13:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You still don't get it, Jo. THREE EDITORS (Lambertman, JTRH, and I) have reverted the edit, just DROP IT already. Do you not listen to us? And please don't use WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as an argument to defend your edit FamicomJL 15:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

TPIR show numbers
Totally unrelated to Wikipedia, but you asked about this on Invision, and I've got...I guess it's an essay about it here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TPIRFanSteve (talk • contribs) 05:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, they couldn't really tape the shows in order this year...at every session, Drew did all the shows from the first six weeks that would use a particular set of games.
 * By the way, you have no idea how gratifying it is to hear the author of the Really Big Text Document tell me that "I'm the one he hoped would answer" his question about TPIR. :-) -TPIRFanSteve 00:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: WIBC
I have no idea, I don't live there either. What I have posted is what I've found on the Internet, and that's only what's happened since October. Sorry I couldn't be of any assistance. JMyrleFuller (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

House
House usually premieres around fall and takes a break during February or March. New episodes of House would be still airing w/o the strike. I doubt that the season will end in February. The source says FOX will close the book on the three remaining episodes, but doesn't say that the season finale will be in February. миражinred 15:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Image118.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Image118.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytfin (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Fancruft
''NOTE: the following discussion was cut and pasted, for some reason, by User:S3884h from their talk page onto mine. The following comment from User:ViperSnake151 was directed to S3884h, not to me.'' Lambertman (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I see that you've added a whole bunch of fancruft to the Deal or No Deal (US game show) article. We usually don't add "that" much fancruft to an article. ViperSnake151 02:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Your version of the article is much too long and detailed for Wikipedia standards. I'm going to move your version to the wiki at TVIV.org and link to it from Wikipedia's version; I enthusiastically suggest you get an account there as you will run into no resistance. Lambertman (talk) 05:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't even bother. I took the liberty of rollingback the article myself, and made seperate articles for each one.  You said you wanted 40,000 bytes.  Does 11,000 suit you?  Forget TVIV.  If you haven't notice, the Deal or No Deal article there is virtually blank.  Nobody cares about going on there.  The last time anybody tapped into that article was last year.  They go to Wikipedia to find out about what's happening on DOND whether you like it or not.  So why even bother? S3884h (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:US TV Sports
A tag has been placed on Template:US TV Sports requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Boloco
An article that you have been involved in editing, Boloco, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Boloco. Thank you. GlassCobra 15:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

WBIW
Nice job on this page. I particularly respect your placing a disclaimer on the talk page. I've added some additional info (mostly technical in the infobox), please review when you get a chance.--Rtphokie (talk) 14:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Alcohol control laws
I have a bit of a question. You made an edit to Indiana stating that beer, wine, as well as liquor are available in grocery stores. I'm wondering if you know if all three are allowed, because I was roadtripping through Indiana and the only convenience store I saw had only beer, but then again, I only saw one convenience store/supermarket that wasn't on the toll road.

Just checking to see if all forms of alcohol are allowed to be sold in grocery stores, because if, say, it restricts certain types, you should edit it to reflect it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.202.127.187 (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I answered the question thusly: I have purchased hard liquor in Meijer, Kroger and SuperTarget. Lambertman (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Often, as a result of Wikipedia.

Mike and Mike in the Morning
Sorry, you deleted the songs and I thought that it was a mistake or something, my mistake :) reverted. I agree, the songs aren't really important. Oli (talk) 12:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

You do realize it's an ignorant comment on the discussion page, right?
That's what I thought, Lumbarman. --Reezy (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * OH NOES I have been pwnt. Lambertman (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Adminship
I was told by another admin Mr. Z-Man that usually alot of administrators have at least 3000 edits so thts probably why you weren't successful in getting to be an Administrator. --Chrismaster1 (talk) 20:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, i still have a lllllllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnngggggggggggggggggggggggg way to go I have under 300 edits still so it'll be a while before I can try to apply. And I've been here for almost 2 years. There is a tool this tool where you can keep track of edits and see how many edits you have so far. Good luck in the future if I can be of some help of anything let me know! --Chrismaster1 (talk) 18:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I didn't hear it from anyone also, I don't know what happened to your message because when it comes to talk pages for articles, I don't delete anything unless its something that I wrote I don't delete someone else's edit. But I didn't hear about Bob Barker returning from anybody, I read it in a issue of "People" Magazine that was out and had a story about that if I remember correctly, it was around the same time that the final episode of the Price Is Right with Bob Barker aired. Now "People" have been known to print some bogus stories so I think that one can be added to the list since there have been no other talk about it. Let me know if you have any further questions. --Chrismaster1 (talk) 21:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

rain policy
this is just my opinion but why do you have a problem with the anomous user adding the rain policy its fact and can be found to be refrenced --Cmedinger (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

with sum editing it can be taken a little farther from opinion--Cmedinger (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

take a look at there rain policy http://www.cedarpoint.com/public/visit/tips.cfm#weather --Cmedinger (talk) 17:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Question
What can I do about the anons who keep taking info out of The Next Food Network Star? I've done 3 reverts already so can't do anymore. Suggestions? -- Nashville Monkey 16:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * But it's factual information, Wikipedia is NOT censored. There has to be a way to let it be known that TFN screwed up. -- Nashville Monkey 17:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * True, in two days it won't matter. I'll just leave it.. -- Nashville Monkey 17:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Lambo, any chance you would be inclined to rephrase the opening on Johnny Carson ..The Tonight Show.....the "For all but the first..." threw me off. Why not say something to the effect for the first 9years 8months it was based in NYC...etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johndoeemail (talk • contribs) 02:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: The Weather Channel
It will interest you to know, I'm sure, that I followed your advice... now that I can see that the page isn't blanked after all. It must have been a temporary glitch at the worst possible time. --Ericdn (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Request for Participation in Wikipedia Research
Lambertman,

Your Request for Adminship (RfA) process was reviewed and studied by our research team at Carnegie Mellon University early in our project to gain insights into the process. We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate. In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.

In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a survey we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process. The survey will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations. We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not instrusive in the Wikipedia community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies. We will also post our results back to the Wikipedia community.

This survey is part of an ongoing research project by students and faculty at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and headed by Professor Robert Kraut.

Take the survey

Thank you!

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free comment on my talk page.

CMUResearcher (talk) 18:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Deal or No Deal (US) models
I have nominated Deal or No Deal (US) models, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Deal or No Deal (US) models. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –xenotalk 15:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

NBC
Just a friendly FYI, that I reverted your decision to undo all of the corrections that I made on NBC. If you do not agree with the revisions, please notify me first for a more detailed explanation. Thanks --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response!! You know, on the NBC article, the spacing of the images (especially of the NBC Tower) needs to be cleaned up a bit. I also thought a nice picture to add to the Red/Blue Network section would be File:Edmund Lowe fsa 8b06653.jpg, since it shows the Blue logo on the microphone. One of the pics of the buildings could be moved down further to make room for it. I also like File:Color TV Camera, WKY-TV.jpg, for the color tv section, since WKY-TV was a NBC affliate since like 1949. What do you think? --Funandtrvl (talk) 00:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Lambertman! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Steve Ryan (author) -
 * 2) Bob Lamey -
 * 3) Bob Zany -

Gamages
(I know it's nine years later and nobody cares, but I don't think I ever did anything on this page Lambertman (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC) )

Copyright problem: Gamages
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Gamages, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.storyoflondon.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=443&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Gamages and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Gamages, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Gamages with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Gamages. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Gamages saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! DrFrench (talk) 12:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of stations that air Casey Kasem's American Top 40: The 80's
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of stations that air Casey Kasem's American Top 40: The 80's, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. B.Wind (talk) 07:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Gsn94.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gsn94.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Name That Tune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMT. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 19:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC).)

July 28: You're invited! Food Deserts & Food Policy in Indianapolis editathon
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 08:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC).)

You're invited! Environmental Justice editathons in Indianapolis & Bloomington
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC).)

You're invited! In-person WikiConference North America Meetup in Indianapolis!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 17:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC).)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

March 17: You're invited! Indiana Women in the Arts editathon
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 21:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Indiana Politics & Government Editathon on Saturday, May 13
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 16:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Indiana State Fair Wiknic on Sunday, July 30
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Underrepresented Artists of Indiana editathon on Oct. 11
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 00:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC).) "

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)