User talk:Lamborg

Hi Lamborg. I'm confused. How can removing EthNet be vandalism? I really want to know what you mean. -- Perfecto 05:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * EthicalNetwork.org is a social networking site, removing it from wikipedia's list of social networking sites is obviously wrong, I certainly consider this vandalism, leave it on. &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by Lamborg (talk &bull; contribs)

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. & You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --  getcrunk    juice   contribs  16:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Stop talking such nonsense you lunatic! It is not advertising but making a legitimate and useful contribution to wikipedia. You need to talk to a head doctor. Thanks. &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by Lamborg (talk &bull; contribs)

Relax, getcrunk. OK, Lamborg, you've added your site, I shall say let it stay, because you've read the guidelines, and you have assured us that, "it is reasonable to expect an article is forthcoming." You have to prove yourself now. -- Perfecto 16:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * kay, fine with me! :) --  getcrunk    juice   contribs  17:16, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Site name
Your site name is "Ethical Network". Do not add an ".org". People will trust that you have good faith that you are not inviting visitors to come visit your site. If visitors are interested, they will look it up. Please allow this small compromise to resolve this issue. You do want to resolve this, right? -- Perfecto 03:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

"... with articles": to stay or go?
Please join us as well on this discussion on the article's Talk page. -- Perfecto 03:13, 1 January 2006 (UTC)