User talk:Lamchop01

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 22:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Lieberman Software Corporation
A tag has been placed on Lieberman Software Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 22:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Lieberman Software Corporation. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 22:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 22:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

FYI conflict of interest guideline
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * see also: Wikipedia is not a soapbox and What may I not have on my user page?
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. — Athaenara ✉  23:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Removal of Lieberman Software Corporation
There are millions of tech companies that all posted similar company information. Why are you specifically singling us out? Why don't you check out all these companies... if Lieberman Software Corporation can't be up there, then you should be able to explain why our competitors can:


 * Cyber-Ark
 * Symark - Beyond Trust
 * Scriptlogic
 * Irdeto
 * Passlogix
 * Quest Software
 * Dameware
 * Panda Security

Lamchop01 (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I copied your comment from the talk page there because it will soon be deleted as a talk page with no accompanying article. The rules apply to everyone, but enforcement of the rules will always be imperfect, and bad articles can slip through the cracks. If you find articles that are inappropriate for Wikipedia, please feel free to nominate them for speedy deletion (for clear offenses for which the criteria for speedy deletion applies), proposed deletion (for pages which don't meet the speedy deletion criteria but are nevertheless clearly against policy) or full deletion discussion (for pages where prod was contested or the deletion is likely to be controversial). &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 19:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I should also note that a distinction exists between an article *about* a company and an article *promoting* said company. Articles that are pure promotion get speedy deleted; articles that have non-promotional text should have the promotional elements removed to salvage the useful information. Unfortunately, your article was filled with so many buzzwords, peacock words and general marketing-speak that it was not possible to simply prune the bad parts. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 19:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Although lamchop was a puppet.. I'm NOT a sockpuppet and I'm also NOT Jane Grafton. In looking at competitors and other technoloyg companies I randomly know, I don't see anything different in the way they've posted their company material versus how we attempted to post our company information. Please explain how the posting of Lieberman Software abuses your guidelines, yet these companies don't.

I look forward to hearing from you. Lamchop01 (talk) 22:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm not an admin; once a page is deleted I lose the ability to read it, so I can't give specific examples, only operate from memory. You may wish to ask the admin who deleted it to explain, or to provide you a copy. If you post some of the text here I might be able to help. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 23:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I'll copy what was submitted to Wiki. I actually used my competitor as a template for our submission to your site. So that is why I'm shocked that they and other companies remain on your site, yet we get taken down.

Background
Lieberman Software is a 100% US based software company that provides Password Management and Privileged Identity Managment solutions for IT enterprises around the world. The company's tools help mitigate internal and external security threats by providing local and domain security management for large cross-platform enterprises. Its privileged identity and configuration management solutions collectively control and report on groups, users, passwords, registries, policies, objects, rights, and services dispersed throughout all servers, workstations, mainframes, databases, and devices in an organization's network.

Lieberman Software Corporation (incorporated in 2004) started as Lieberman & Associates in 1978 by Philip Lieberman. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, CA and has additional offices in San Francisco, Austin, and Dallas. Our tools are deployed in many of the largest organizations in the world including Government, Financial, Healthcare and Retail institutions.

Company Focus: Privileged Identity Management Software
Because common identity and access management frameworks do not manage or control privileged identities, privileged identity management software began to emerge after the year 2000. The first commercially available software for managing privileged identities on distributed server and desktop computers was Random Password Manager, released in 2001 by Lieberman Software Corporation. The current version of the company's software has been updated to manage process services, tasks, and privileged application identities and is called: Enterprise Random Password Manager.

Enterprise Random Password Manager is a comprehensive credential management solution which includes automated:


 * Continuous Auto-Discovery of machines, process accounts, local & fire call accounts, services and tasks – and everywhere those accounts are referenced
 * Password Change Process for randomizing privileged accounts and propagating those changes everywhere the accounts are used to avoid lock outs
 * Storage of complex, random passwords in an encrypted repository
 * Role Based Provisioning of password access and delegation
 * Auditing of every password request, use and change for compliance reporting

Critically important is the ability to perform account propagation to maintain common, cryptographically complex, frequently changed passwords among interdependent services to avoid disruptions whenever any of these passwords are changed.

Products

 * Enterprise Random Password Manager - March 2002
 * Random Password Manager - April 2001
 * User Manager Pro Suite - February 1999
 * Service Account Manager - February 1999
 * Account Reset Console - April 2004
 * Task Scheduler Pro - January 2002
 * COM+ Manager - August 2004
 * Server-to-Server Password Manager - 1998
 * Intensive Care Utilities - 1998
 * LAN Server to NT Migration Wizard - 1998

Executive Officers

 * Philip Lieberman: Founder, President & CEO
 * Jess Richter: Director of Sales
 * Jane Grafton: Director of Business Development
 * Diana Kreklow - Business Alliance Director
 * Paul Del Piero - Director of Marketing
 * Chris Stoneff Product Management

External Links & Research

 * According to Gartner, Lieberman Software has one of the largest customer bases of the vendors included in their June 2009 MarketScope for Shared-Account/Software-Account Password Management
 * Lieberman Software Corporation Website

Category:Computer security Category:Password authentication Category:Authentication methods Category:Identity management Category:Identity management systems Category:Computer companies of the United States Category:Software companies of the United States

So, can you please explain where I'm in violation and yet many of the companies I listed above doing the same thing are not. A little guidance would be extremely helpful.

Thanks. Lamchop01 (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi ShadowRanger, I'm still waiting on a response from you. I sent you a note on January 11th. What are your thoughts on what I attached above?

Lamchop01 (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)