User talk:Lamellibranch

Welcome!

Hello, Lamellibranch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as MIQE, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dawnseeker2000  19:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of MIQE


A tag has been placed on MIQE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dawnseeker2000  19:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation


I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MIQE, Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's an example of how to add references: Chzz is 98 years old.&lt;ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. &lt;/ref>

He likes tea.&lt;ref> Smith, John. " Interview with Chzz", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put at the end of this page, followed by a question.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 22:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! AndrewN talk 18:07, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Would you please give me an example of how I can change the text? I thought the original entry was neutral enough.Lamellibranch (talk) 18:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Please note: if you simply post a question here on your own user talk page, then it's quite likely nobody will see it. If you put (with a question), it will get attention. :Fortunately, in this specific case, I happened to check your page and saw your question. So...


 * Firstly, it would help if I could understand what it was about :-) -Sorry, but, it isn't clear to the average person; it needs to start off, at least, with a simple clear indication of what the article is all about. Beginning with something like,


 * Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) is a technique used in ... -what? I don't know; what field of science? What is the purpose of it, what is it all about? Try and explain in terms you might use if explaining it to a random-stranger (but in a formal tone, like a paper encyclopaedia). We call the first part of the article the "lede", so please take a look at WP:LEDE.


 * The, the problem with the tone of the language is, that it sounds too 'discursive' - essay-like - instead of an Encyclopaedia article presenting facts in a neutral manner without actually forming any opinion or giving any interpretation. A neutral point-of-view, with no novel synthesis. Specifically;


 * it became apparent that the technique had great potential not simply for DNA detection and amplification, but also for quantitative studies


 * The "it has been apparent" is unnecessary - apparent to whom? And "great potential" also sounds non-neutral. It'd probably be better with something like, the technique had the potential to simplify DNA detection and amplification, and also in quantitative studies.


 * Please note the use of two wikilinks there, to try and help the reader understand better. I don't actually know if those links are the best target - I don't actually know this subject very well; but, some good links would also help.


 * Other examples that might be non-neutral include A major step forward... (was it really a major step? maybe it was; I wouldn't know - but, be careful in opinion); developed a plethora of different approaches - that's a bit of a vague term; it'd be better to just say 'several techniques', probably; and A detailed checklist covering each stage of work with recommendations as to what is desirable information to submit with publications and which is essential information to submit is available online (see External Links below) - that last sentence, I'd suggest just removing; wikipedia isn't a guidebook, and it actually sounds a little promotional.


 * Two further suggestions


 * Take a look at Make technical articles understandable
 * Look at some of our best articles in similar topic-areas, for ideas: e.g. WP:FA


 * I hope that helps, and hope it isn't "too much information". Just remember, you can put right here, any time, and ask any question. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  00:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)