User talk:Lamontofbuckie

Duguid Baronets
Read. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  08:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Duguid Baronets


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Duguid Baronets, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  08:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Baron Duguid
I have deleted both your articles. Wikipedia has a policy of WP:Verifiability: "This policy requires that all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged be attributed to a reliable, published source." There is no confirmation of what these articles said in places like Leighrayment.com or Thepeerage.com, either under Duguid or Lamont, either Baronet or Baron (which are not the same thing, though your articles seemed to treat them interchangeably). JohnCD (talk) 11:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)