User talk:Lancejack

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Joseph Smith has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Joseph Smith was changed by Lancejack (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850274 on 2016-08-23T04:12:18+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Smith. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Smith, you may be blocked from editing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Joseph Smith. Mayur (talk•Email) 04:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * With respect, the editor's final two edits that changed "west" to "West" appeared to be in good faith (but wrong per MOS:COMPASS), so perhaps they learned after the final warning that the vandalism is unacceptable? They will need to learn to bite their tongue in edit summaries though. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Those edits were clearly minor edits to troll and taunt. But, if another admin wants to grant the user a bit more rope, I have no objection to the user being given a last chance. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 06:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)