User talk:Lancepickell

Welcome!
Hello, Lancepickell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2018
Hello, I'm Babymissfortune. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nick Fuentes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Baby miss fortune 02:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
- MrX 🖋 12:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Culture of Critique series have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 22:59, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 12)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Lancepickell/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft does not make a credible claim of significance. This draft would be subject to speedy deletion in article space. If this draft is resubmitted in its current form or a similar form, it should be nominated for deletion.

This draft has no substantive content.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jack Posobiec. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --JBL (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 03:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Please read this entire page. You have been warned in various ways five times previously. So, why did you say that you had never been warned? Cullen328  Let's discuss it  20:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Well I can go an start a new account with a new IP address, but thats not what I want to do. Can i delete all my changes and start editing in an unbiased way? I NEVER GOT A WARNING. I went through a small white nationalist ideology but have gon back to my traditional christian viewpoint. Please can I get a second chance.
 * Trying to start up a new account under a new IP is a sure-fire way to get yourself banned (significantly more difficult to come back from than a block), so I would recommend against it. You also openly self-identified as alt-right less than a week ago, so your sudden change of ideology is somewhat hard to believe... Yunshui 雲 水 18:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

There is definitely a bias in some of my naive immature edits. I would argue that a lot of the things I was correcting was indeed leftist biased articles. I defended ilhan Omar's page last week against unfair portrayals, Am I truly alt-right coming to the defense of a Black muslim female democrat? I understand the Rights ideology more than everyone else on here so when I see people trying to label Jack Posobiec or Mike Cernovich as Alt-Right, I correctly change it. Im new to this so some left winger can go find some buzzfeed article written by some idiot that doesn't know what they're talking about. I hate Posebic and Cernovich but will correctly change something that is OBVIOUSLY incorrect. Just because somebody is a conspiracy theorist and retweeted a pizzagate story doesn't make them "Alt-Right".

If you want my ideology I am a White 21 year old male from North Carolina. I am an independent. I study history. I believe in traditional christian moral frameworks. I loathe neoconservatism and social darwinism arguments on the right. I also loathe white male hating on the left.

Are you trying to say people with ideology can't function in society and cant change articles. I promise I will never make an argument without citations