User talk:Lantanabelle

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Bidgee (talk) 15:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to 104.1 Territory FM constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. Alexnia (talk) 15:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Bidgee (talk) 16:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

AN/I report
There is a discussio about you at the Admin noticeboard here. Please feel free to add your side of the story. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 18:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Regarding edit-warring
If you are right in your desired edit, you'll be able to persuade other users that Wikipedia's rules support it. The way to deal with a disagreement is to discuss. I see you've started to do that, which is good, but you also kept restoring your desired change before you reached consensus on the talk page. Wikipedia has very firm rules about edit-warring, because it's very disruptive to the encyclopedia, and also because edit wars are inherently unwinnable- as you have seen, both sides can keep reverting each other forever. That's why we have rules against it. This is a short block; when it expires, you can explain, using reliable sources and Wikipedia rules to support your reasons, why your desired edits make the best neutral encyclopedia article. Of course, you are hampered by your conflict of interest; we all know how hard it is to remain unbiased about subjects close to our own hearts. If, after some discussion, you find that no one outside your company agrees with you, you should open your mind to the possibility that you might be wrong. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Image source and copyright licensing problem with Image:TerritoryFM.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:TerritoryFM.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the image under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)