User talk:Lantern23

Proposed deletion of Convert Interleaf QuickSilver


The article Convert Interleaf QuickSilver has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * difficult to establish context, but I think how-to guide and lack of notability are good deletion grounds

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 21:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 18:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Sincere offer
Hi.

"a 72 yr. old retired former academic person" makes me sit up. I try to help people; just ask Howard Zimmerman - in fact, you may like to introduce yourself to him, on his user talk page - User talk:Hezimmerman.

Of course, I can only help within the remit of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Without wishing to sound condescending: You need to understand, it is an encyclopaedia - a tertiary source of information which presents things that others have written about. We collate information, we present it in a meaningful way, to add to the 'sum of all human knowledge'.

You want to help add to that, I realise. And that's quite possible - if you'll understand the requirements for adding to wikipedia.

First, you can't put "meta information", ie

"This article affects a relatively small group of people and companies, but for those who face the problem of conversion of Interleaf, the issue is immediate and the solution not obvious.

This article, therefore, discusses some of the history and problems associated with conversion of Interleaf (Quicksilver) documents, and, discusses two pathways to achieve conversion"

We don't talk about 'this article'. We just give facts, based on references to what "we" (community) consider 'reliable sources' - that's newspapers, books, and so forth. We state facts, and let the reader form opinion. It all has to be verifiable.

"The Interleaf company gave indications of failing by 1996-97,[3]." - yep, that's OK. Good information; referenced. Verifiable. Not really interpretation. Fine.

"By 2000, the company ceased operation. The code was purchased by Broadvision" - OK, so, now, we need references. Where can a reader check that? It has to be verifiable - through a published, reliable source. We cannot present anything we "just know".

"The market for Interleaf conversion is small, the task is complex and technically non-trivial" - that may well be "true" - I believe you. But, again, it must be verifiable through references.

I hope you understand. Let me know.

One thing is for sure - there's plenty of help available to people who want to add to Wikipedia; and I humbly offer to help. Any time. No question is silly or too much trouble.

I wish you all the best.

I apologize for the unnecessary obfuscation caused by the tech. I hope you'll stick with it, and seek more help, from me or others.

My name is "Chzz". You can email me, chzz@live.co.uk or, leave a message on User talk:Chzz.

You could ask for help on the helpdesk.

Thanks.  Chzz  ► 19:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interleaf (Quicksilver) Conversion concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interleaf (Quicksilver) Conversion, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Interleaf (Quicksilver) Conversion


Hello Lantern23. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Interleaf (Quicksilver) Conversion.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)