User talk:Lantog

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 09:24, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi Lantog. If you want to help in creating a better article, you're going to have to do so constructively. Make use of the talk page. If you continue to blank articles, you may be blocked from editing, as this is not constructive editing. Dysprosia 09:27, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Regarding F.O. Matthiessen, I'm glad to have another interested editor of the article. I find some of your deletions a little confusing: it seems like you're removing factual material from the article, which is a bad idea. Please don't delete significant material without first discussing it on the Talk page. It's a common mistake for new editors. -- Rbellin|Talk 15:47, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

3RR violation

 * Lantog: You have violated the three revert rule on Queer theory and can thereby be blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24-hours by any admin. I've chosen not to because you seem to be discussing the issue on this talk page, but you are open to being blocked by any other admin just for the actions you've already taken. Please do not unilaterally revert the article any further, but rather, try to come to a consensus with other editors on the Talk:Queer theory page. - Seth Ilys 17:39, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 24hrs
You have been blocked for 24 hours under the three revert rule. Your fifth revert after Seth Ilys showed you some lienency demonstrated an inablity to communicate well. In addition, your have vandalized the article in the past: (1 and 2). After the ban has passed, please come and discuss the article on the talk page before making any changes. Burgundavia 20:06, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Talk page un-blanking
Lantog, in answer to your question, I edited your talk page to restore the messages you've been deleting. Please have a look at Avoiding common mistakes and Talk etiquette FAQ -- blanking your talk page in order to hide criticism is generally considered bad manners (though it's not expressly forbidden by policy, it is often frowned upon and/or reverted). I don't mean to make trouble for you, and in fact, the major reason I restored the messages you deleted earlier was to preserve my earlier link to Avoiding common mistakes, a page I sincerely recommend that you read. From what you've written I think you probably have a lot to contribute to Wikipedia, and I think Wikipedia sorely needs more expertise in your fields, so I suggest you take a look over the policies and guidelines a bit more carefully and learn the way Wikipedia works before needlessly taking offense or getting into unnecessary quarrels. -- Rbellin|Talk 05:26, 5 May 2005 (UTC)