User talk:Lapastillaroja

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(talk&#124;contrib) 01:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 David_FLXD  (Talk) 20:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Roosh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  David_FLXD  (Talk) 21:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Care to Try?
Hi ... I saw your edits and wanted to introduce myself. I have no affiliation with Roosh V, but out of pure interest I created stub articles on a variety of topics in the effort to document the fascinating sub-culture that is the manosphere. I have more references and other material but gave up in the face of repeated campaigns by biased editors. Perhaps you'll be more lucky than I if you care to try.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Female_solipsism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Beta_Provider http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Marriage_Strike http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/White_Knight http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Rationalization_Hamster http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sexual_Market_Value http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Cock_Carousel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Manosphere

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dalrock http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/GirlWritesWhat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Barbarossa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Roissy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/W.F._Price — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethicalv (talk • contribs) 09:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)