User talk:Lapoderosa

Nomination of Fr. Christoforos Schuff for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fr. Christoforos Schuff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fr. Christoforos Schuff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:23, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christoforos Schuff


A tag has been placed on Christoforos Schuff, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Angry Python (talk) 06:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, I have posted a reply to your message at User talk:Sjakkalle Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. You are not the first, and you will not be the last person who wind up seeing their first article deleted. Actually, you did a pretty good and meticulous job on sourcing the article, and I am pretty impressed with that effort. You may want to work on improving and expanding existing articles since writing a new article from scratch is rather more difficult. Although Wikipedia boasts of having several millions of articles, very many of them are in need of expansion and development. Among Norwegian musicians, this includes articles on well-known figures like Sigvart Dagsland and Bjørn Eidsvåg.

Also, I have noticed that you sign your posts manually. In order to make an automated signature and timestamp, you can instead type four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of the post. Happy editing! Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)