User talk:Lapopessa

Your recent edit to Postal history
Please don't modify wikilinks to articles that don't exist from ones that do exist. This is a waste of time for all you us. Contribute constructively. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ww2censor 22:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It seems that you most likely have little or knowledge of Philately because you seem to be confusing the history of the post with postal history. All your edits to this page, except for one link correction, show you don't know what postal history is. It is not the history of the post and its developments, so please make edits that are constructive to the topic. Postal history is a term not a definition and because the whole article is about a philatelic topic there is absolutely no need to use the phrase philatelic postal history studies when postal history IS a philatelic study, so those edits are redundant. May I suggest that, if you have significant philatelic knowledge, you contribute constructively with accurate, verifiable, information to the many philatelic topics that need expansion. You might even want to join the WikiProject Philately if you do know more about this area of interest. It just seems quite strange that you have made just four edits in four and a half months, and all of these have been to this article alone with no contribution to anything else, either philatelic or otherwise. Cheers ww2censor 20:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)