User talk:LaraCroft NYC

One Holy....
Thanks for uncovering the error re: source being the Council of Nicea in 325. Nice work! I have corrected it. Nice work! Afaprof01 (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

In so far
"In so far" is only listed as a three word phrase in the Oxford English Dictionary, not as a single word. William Avery (talk) 16:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

March 2013
In a recent edit to the page Catholic Church, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ten percent of the brain myth, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

August 2017
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Pontius Pilate. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Pontius Pilate, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Pontius Pilate
Just because Pontius Pilate is "best known today for..." doesn't mean it actually happened does it? History is filled with such examples... Jim1138 (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

The possessive
Please see an American website: http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/apostro.asp and a British http://www.ef.edu/english-resources/english-grammar/forming-possessive/ Jim1138 (talk) 09:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)