User talk:Lareira/sandbox

Peer review for contributions to Transgender health care
Overall: Good work adjusting the lead section. It's clear and covers the content of the article. The way you restructured the article is helpful, especially by adding the section for global access. I would suggest moving the sections for transgender youth and older adults above the global access section.

Under section “Gender Variance and Medicine”:

- “For centuries” seems unverifiable.

- This section is titled "gender variance," but the terms referenced in the section include “dysphoria” and “incongruence.” Is it possible to include a statement at the beginning of this section outlining how gender variance refers to dysphoria, incongruence, and more?

- This section does a nice job of tracking the way gender variance was initially pathologized and how that has shifted.

- Citations are needed in the sex reassignment surgery section. Though you didn’t edit that part, your main contributions are in the same section.

Under section “Health Risks”:

- The sentence about “resource-constrained” settings is a little unclear.

Slothstuff (talk) 13:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)