User talk:Larfers

Proposed deletion of Bel Air, North Dakota


The article Bel Air, North Dakota has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Likely hoax. No census data available or geographic name registration for listed township. Both unlikely for a population of stated size.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Heather Linstad, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Bel Air, North Dakota for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bel Air, North Dakota is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bel Air, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)