User talk:Larrya49

August 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Based on our review of other links (2 in particular) on the Wikipedia Numerology page we edited, we thought it would be okay to add several links to some very useful and informative articles on numerology that add new insight to this subject, and not currently available on the Wikipedia page for Numerology. Neither of first 2 articles I submitted are about our products and expand significantly on the material on Wikipedia, though they do include some links to our products. The "New Findings In Numerology" article in particular is about an extensive study on the validity of numerology involving 1,000 subjects that provides a different conclusion then some of the studies that do appear on Wikipedia.

I admit that we do offer Numerology Reports at the bottom of each page and in several locations on some of the articles, but again, these can be very valuable to someone really interested in numerology. However, I do understand that you can see this as a form of advertising, and for that I do apologize if I have violated any Wikipedia rules and guidelines.

If I created versions of the 2 articles ("An Introduction to the Fascinating Science of Numbers" and "New Findings In Numerology") without any reference to any products we offer (though the navigation bar would still be present), as done with some of the other links you already have on this page, would that be acceptable. If not, I fully understand your reasons and decision and am okay with it. I mainly wanted to provide access to some really good articles. If you take the time to read the articles we linked to, I think you will see the value I am talking about. I do agree, though, that you will want to remove the" Numerology Article Summary" link, as a couple of these articles do have links to our products and would be more difficult for us to change.

Thank you for your re-consideration, and again, I apologize for violating any Wikipedia rules.

I am the only person with access to this account and I can confirm that I will continue to be the only person using this account. The 2 articles that I would like to link to, once removing ALL advertising and promotion from them, are informative articles on numerology that would be of value to people interested in this subject. These articles reside in the article section of a website that does offer numerology software and reports for sale of which I am an owner, so this may be a conflict of interest based on your guidelines. However, the articles (once I remove all references) will have no reference to our products and services and are intended as a public service for providing valuable information on the subject of numerology. Thank you again for re-considering allowing these 2 links.

I am not the author of either of the 2 articles, if you please take the time to review the actual articles. I have a conflict of interest only in that I am in the business of offering numerology software and reports, though the 2 articles are not on either of these subjects. What I am asking for is no different then 2 other links that have been on the Numerology Wikipedia page for some time.
 * Because of WP:IDHT, I have revoked talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 10:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.