User talk:Larryq34

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Verifiability
You have re-added a large chunk of unsourced content to the Visual FoxPro article which was originally added by the IP editor, 86.147.60.113. This information contained no inline citations to verify the content. Any information that is challenged or likely to be challenged must meet the burden of evidence. In other words, you must provide a secondary, reliable source that has already been reliably published. Per BOLD, revert, discuss cycle a bold addition of content that has been reverted should be discussed and a consensus formed before it can be returned. The IP boldly added the content. SarekOfVulcan reverted that, but no discussion was made by you or the IP editor and no references have been provided. By adding the content back without discussion or references you could be in violation of Wikipedia's edt warring policy and could be blocked from editing if this continues. Please see this as a friendly and civil warning that your behavior is not acceptable within the Wikipedia community. if you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talkpage.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:29, 18 January 2013 (UTC)