User talk:LarsonGCD

A kitten for you!
Yay kittens!

Kmyndestad (talk) 13:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC) 

FAM149A
Hi. Thanks for your contributions to the FAM149A article. I would really, really, really appreciate if you would ask your instructor to contact me. While the contribution of your class are appreciated, they contains some formatting errors that require a lot of cleanup by other editors afterwards. I also have some concerns about the notability and original research contained in these articles.

Here are a number of common formatting issues that I have identified in the articles created by your class:


 * For consistency with other Gene Wiki articles, the GNF_Protein_box infobox should normally not be included directly in the article but rather transcluded using the PBB template. User:ProteinBoxBot is setup to maintain transcluded templates, but not templates directly contained in articles. The GeneWikiGenerator will automatically create both the template and the article that transcludes the template.
 * Concerning the lead sentence, as discussed here and here, we have tried to make clear that these Gene Wiki articles are not only about the human gene/protein, but also orthologs that exist in other species. The wording that was reached through consensus is perhaps a little awkward, but it is both accurate and concise:
 *  is a protein that in humans is encoded by the  gene.
 * The "that" in the above sentence is non-limiting implying that the protein (and gene) exists in other species besides human.


 * Per WP:HEAD, sentence case should be used for section headings.
 * Per WP:REFPUNC, punctuation before citations.
 * Selection of gene. A gene, even if it is human, may not meet Wikipedia notability requirements unless a function has determined for the protein.  Many of the genes that have been selected by your class are pretty obscure.  There are some well known gene families for which not all members have Wikipedia articles that might be a better choice since the function of these genes is generally known (see for example the red links in Solute_carrier_family). Don't worry about the notability for now. I am certainly not suggesting that the subject of any articles that have already been created be changed.  However, I would appreciate if you would pass this information along to your instructor so that selection of genes by future classes consider notability.
 * In case you haven't seen this yet, please check out User:Diberri's Wikipedia template filling tool (instructions). Given a PubMed ID, one can quickly produce a full citation that can be copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. This tool can save you a lot of work and ensure that the citations are displayed in a consistent manner.

Thanks. Boghog (talk) 04:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:FAM149A Phylogenetic tree.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FAM149A Phylogenetic tree.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:02, 3 August 2016 (UTC)