User talk:LassusAvem

August 2021
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  23:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

What affiliation do you have with MUN? 331dot (talk) 08:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)mu

I'm someone who used to participate in MUN conferences, I have helped to train students for my school programs and I have moderated MUN committee sessions. There is no central governing body for MUN, but in general, that is how I am affiliated. The edits that were made were well-intentioned and were meant to add detail and clarity to some sections that were outdated. I did source my edits with articles that I had written, I thought this was the right thing to do since the page has a header asking to verify claims. I believe the thing that triggered the promotional edits alert was when I added a link to my articles page to the external links sections, again I'm very sorry about that. --MUNprep (talk) 17:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Thankyou for highlighting the conflict of interest that I was certainly guilty of, I have reviewed the content of the COI article and will be sure to highlight any future conflict going forward using the appropriate commands as a connected contributor. I will also make a mention of it on my Talk page once I have dealt with this situation appropriately. Finally, I'll just make sure to also use other sources in future edits with that article. In general I should have been more responsible in looking over the appropriate literature on Wikipedia rules before diving into editing an article. Regarding other articles that I may edit, I am interested in global affairs and would look to work on other topics in that area. I have recently considered providing some useful edits on the Five Eyes article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LassusAvem (talk • contribs)


 * Hi there Lassus, since no-one's responded I'll take over reviewing. This is purely co-incidental, but I was especially active in MUN in my younger days to the tune of 45 conferences, so hopefully that will help the review.


 * Are you linked with the site (there's no personal details on it, so I'm happy to ask that on-wiki, but please feel free to blank this and email me if you view it as necessary)? Afaict it's not actually a paid organisation, so you'd still be a "regular" connected contributor, but has some relevance. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

globally renamed MUNprep to LassusAvem
globally renamed MUNprep to LassusAvem -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 18:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)