User talk:LastVisibleDog

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. You can sign your post like I did by using 4 tildes (~&#126;), which will leave your username and time you posted the comment.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial, which can be very useful later.
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary
 * Check out Redwolf24's Bootcamp! Redwolf is a very friendly user, and this page might prove useful to you.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes at some point, here is what Wikipedia is not, which might help you out. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing! - User:Mys e kurity|Mysekurity ]] additions | e-mail ]]01:41, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Bill Clinton
After reviewing the Clinton article, I would have to say that claims were still "unsubstantial" as they("clinton did drugs") could not be proven. Nothing in the Bush articles says "bush did drugs". I would however agree to adding in the Roger qoute, so that the possibility of Clinton doing drugs in his ealier years is not entirely dismissed as it currently is in the article. Thank you. Voice of  All  @ ''' 02:08, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

By the way, On behalf of all Esperanza members, welcome to Wikipedia! Voice of  All  @ ''' 02:09, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Three revert rule
Please do not keep adding your edits to George W. Bush without discussing them. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. -- Rhobite 03:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

You are mistaken, I am discussing the chances - seems you are the one that is deleting without discussing. I did not revert my changes - I thought I was the victim of a timing issue when I posted. I only later found out you were deleting my well-sourced relevant information. I think your reason for deleting my edit was thin and you should participate in the decision first. -LastVisibleDog 04:12, 20 October 2005 (UTC)