User talk:Last rabbi

Render to Caesar
Hello,

I reverted this edit, because you deleted a very appropriate contribution; like I stated in my edit summary, the lead is supposed to contain a "whole" summary of what has been discussed in detail in the body of the article. Also note that while everyone is welcomed to edit the wikipedia, contributions should be from a neutral point of view, without any bias. Be aware that continuous vandalism of the Wikipedia may get you blocked from editing without further notice.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your comment reproduced above. I absolutely agree that contributions should be from a neutral point of view without any bias. Which is why I reverted your contribution. Because it unfortunately appears that the intent of its inclusion in the lead (and especially the timing of it) served to dilute the achievements of the film which were recently added. Hopefully, this was inadvertent. Otherwise, why was this 'very appropriate contribution' not made prior to the very recent addition of awards won on this particular page? What has suddenly 'inspired' it? And why is this 'very appropriate contribution' notably absent from the leads of several other Nigerian film pages that this contributor has either created or expanded (a fact that can easily be verified)?


 * This is what is troubling.


 * On a general point, this 'very appropriate contribution' is far from being a customary inclusion in the lead section of Wikipedia film pages; on the contrary, it is notably absent from the pages of several Hollywood films (again, a fact that can easily be verified). So again the question is: Why the insistence that it must appear without fail on this particular film page, and the contribution made immediately after the page had been updated with awards recently won?


 * As you correctly point out: CONTRIBUTIONS SHOULD BE FROM A NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW, WITHOUT ANY BIAS.


 * Which is why the edit was reverted.


 * Please note.


 * Last rabbi (talk) 22:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Because it isn't present in some other articles doesn't mean it can't appear here. You can go through the pain of adding reception summary to articles and no one would revert you....just the same way I can't remove your awards addition to the lead because it is a repetition of what's in the accolade section, you also can't go about removing appropriate content as you wish.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Render to Caesar
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Render to Caesar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 00:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)