User talk:Lastdaysofdisco/sandbox

I think the reason that Wikipedia has to be "properly referenced from legitimate and verifiable sources, in order to maintain academic integrity" is because it is a secondary source and the reason that EB "suspiciously provides no references" is because it is a primary source. To my (likely erroneous) knowledge, a primary source does not need references because it IS a reference.

Of course, after reading several assignments and a comment on my talk page...I question my understanding of primary and secondary sources as well as my understanding of what constitutes an authoritative source.

In any case, interesting topics, nicely done!

Memelme (talk) 02:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)