User talk:Latimhc0/Edward Wilmot Blyden

Peer Review
“Blyden's ideas remain influential to this day.” This sentence in the second paragraph, at the end, does not seem relevant to that section or well placed. I feel that the editor who added it just wanted to put it somewhere. I would take it out.

I see numerous spots throughout the article where you can make grammatical changes.

“Blyden became a teacher for five years in the British West African colony of Sierra Leone in the early twentieth century.” This sentence is in the first paragraph. I would change became to was.

In the first paragraph of the early life and education section there should be commas added to the date. In that same paragraph a comma should be added after, “Between 1842 and 1845”. You could also change the final sentence in that first paragraph to end with “and became fluent in Spanish.”

In the next paragraph cut out the, after “lived near the church,”.

Overall, your article could be improved by making the necessary grammatical improvements throughout.

I thought you did really well in making your sentences clear and flow nicely. Despite some grammatical confusion I think you made the article less confusing than it was before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxjd0 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

The citations you’ve added are really beneficial. GrandeCuy15 (talk) 03:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)