User talk:Latinandgreekhon


 * }

File:Threegraces lh ima 2010.jpg
Hello! Were you the photographer of "File:Threegraces lh ima 2010.jpg"? If so, I had a discussion with another editor about it at "commons:Commons:Village pump/Copyright", and it seems it may be in the public domain. We can therefore transfer it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of using it at the English Wikipedia under a fair-use justification. Once this has been done, we might also be able to use the photograph in DYK on the main page. Could you change the Flickr licence to either CC-BY-2.0 or CC-BY-SA-2.0? — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 13:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, JackLee. I am the photographer. I'm glad someone looked at that nomination! It's great that the photo qualifies for the Commons. I'll take care of the Flickr license today. Are you offering to move the photo to the Commons, or should I do it? Latinandgreekhon (talk) 15:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and do it if you are familiar with the process. The editor I spoke to over at the Commons suggested stating on the file description page that the PD-US-no notice licence applies to the statue. (I normally put such tags in the permission field of the Artwork template together with a suitable descriptive note: see, for example, "File:Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia - IMG 7496.JPG".) As the photographer, you also need to select a suitable free licence. If you need help, let me know by leaving a message here. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 18:26, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the information! I am unfamiliar with the process, so I would appreciate your assistance. (This was actually the first photo I've added to Wikipedia, and my first Flickr photo as well, so everything is slow for me.) If it isn't too much trouble for you, would you be willing to do the move? If not, please just let me know and I'll figure it out. I'll post here when I've changed the Flickr license. Latinandgreekhon (talk) 19:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello, I got a chance to change the license! (I would have done it when I last posted, but I had no idea how long it would take.) I hope that's what you needed. Let me know if I should do anything else with the photo. Latinandgreekhon (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅. No problem. I have uploaded the file to the Commons as "File:The Three Graces, Indianapolis Museum of Art - 20101115.jpg". If an image is on the English Wikipedia or another Wikipedia project, it can be moved to the Commons using the CommonsHelper. However, I didn't use this tool because the file was tagged as non-free at the English Wikipedia, which CommonsHelper will not accept. Instead, I used Flinfo. Flinfo is not a fully automated tool as you need to manually download each file from Flickr on to your hard disk, then upload it to the Commons. However, Flinfo helps by extracting information about the photograph from Flickr. I also applied the template to the file description page and filled it in based on information at "The Three Graces (Indianapolis)". — Cheers,  Jack Lee  –talk– 04:30, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for The Three Graces (Indianapolis)
Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Antique Wellhead for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antique Wellhead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antique Wellhead until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Copy of Diana of Versailles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copy of Diana of Versailles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Copy of Diana of Versailles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Fountain (Oldfields Estate) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fountain (Oldfields Estate) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fountain (Oldfields Estate) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Diana with Dog for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana with Dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Diana with Dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:27, 18 March 2013 (UTC)